Burnout
Assessment
Tool
Handleiding & vragenlijst
Vragenlijst
Vaak gestelde vragen
Is de BAT gedigitaliseerd?
Neen, de BAT is in essentie een ‘papieren’ vragenlijst. Een digitale versie werd niet ontwikkeld door het onderzoeksteam.
Mag ik de BAT zomaar gebruiken/verspreiden?
Ja, dat is het doel! We moedigen actief een verspreiding van het instrument aan – hoe meer mensen hem gebruiken, hoe beter. Wij staan uiteraard altijd open voor geanonimiseerde data. Dit biedt ons de mogelijkheid om de BAT in de toekomst nog beter te maken.
P.S. Hou wel de auteursrechten in het achterhoofd en gebruik de correcte citatie (tip! kijk op de eerste pagina van de handleiding)
Wetenschappelijke publicaties
Haar, J. (2022). What are the odds of burnt-out risk after leaving the job? Turnover inbtent consequences of worker burnout using a two sample New Zealand study. International Journal of Selection and Assessment. https://doi.org/1111/ijsa.12393.
Hadžibajramović, E., Schaufeli, W., & de Witte, H. (2022). Shortening of the Burnout Assessment Tool (BAT) – from 23 to 12 items using content and Rasch analysis. BMC Public Health, 22, 560. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-12946-y.
SYmposia & studiedagen
Persconferentie lancering – 2019
Persbericht naar aanleiding van de lancering:
Één op zes werkende vlamingen kampt met burn-out klachten of loopt er risico op
Powerpoint presentatie persconferentie:
Persconferentie – lancering Burnout Assessment Tool – dinsdag 19 maart
Studiedag lancering – 2019
14.00 – 15.00 Introductie van de BAT door het onderzoeksteam
Waarom de BAT? Het belang van burn-out & de nieuwe meting
Wilmar Schaufeli
Wat is de BAT? De eigenschappen en sterktes van de nieuwe meting
Steffie Desart
15.00 – 16.20 Een toelichting rond burn-out door de project partners
Marieke Impens (The Human Link)
Sofie Lameire (Securex)
Hilde De Man (IDEWE)
16.20 – 17.00 Een panelgesprek: meten is weten, ook bij burn-out?
Panelgesprek tussen Wilmar Schaufeli, Viki Broes (voorzitter burn-out.Vlaanderen), Lode Godderis (KU Leuven), Elke Geraerts (Better Minds at Work) met interactie van het publiek en onder leiding van Hans De Witte.
BAT @ EAWOP – 2022
10.00 – 10.05 Opening by Wilmar Schaufeli
10.05 – 11.35 Part I: Psychometric characteristics and validity of the BAT
Chiara Consiglio, Greta Mazzetti & Wilmar Schaufeli
The Burnout Assessment Tool in Ecuador and Brazil
Ana Claudia Souza Vazquez, Claudio Hurtz, Cecilia Alexandra Portalanza-Chavarria, Clarissa P. P. de Freitas & Andrea M. Vinueza Solórzano
Angelique de Rijk, Hans de Witte, Robin Kok & Wilmar Schaufeli
Shortening of the Burnout Assessment Tool (BAT) using content and Rasch analysis.
Emina Hadžibajramović, Wilmar Schaufeli & Hans De Witte
Romanian Short Version of the Burnout Assessment Tool: Psychometric Properties.
Bogdan Oprea & Dragoș Iliescu
11.35 – 12.00 Discussion
12.00 – 13.15 Part II: Longitudinal perspectives on burnout
Jürgen Glaser & Christian Seubert
Is it boredom, burnout, work addiction, work engagement or job satisfaction that matters most to employee outcomes? A six-month follow-up study in the Finnish general working population
Jari J. Hakanen & Janne Kaltiainen
Professional burnout during turbulent times: one-year follow-up study in four occupations
Beata A. Basinska, Ewa Gruszczynska, & Wilmar Schaufeli
Marisa Salanova, Isabella Meneghel, Valeria Cruz & Margarita Tarragona
13.15 – 13.45 Discussion
13.45 – 14.00 Conclusions and outlook
BAT Research Seminar @ Leuven – 2022
Day 1 – 22.09.22
Part 1 @ Getting started
Welcome and get to know each other
Hans De Witte
Science: Where do we stand?
Wilmar Schaufeli
Practice: Where do we stand?
Steffie Desart
Part 2 @ Why not starting with the psychometric properties of the BAT? – Take 1 – single country studies
Bogdan Oprea & Dragoș Iliescu. Romanian Short Version of the Burnout Assessment Tool: Psychometric Properties.
Emina Hadžibajramović, Malin Hansson, Magnus Akerstrom, Anna Dencker, Gunnel Hensing & Emma Hagqvist. Construct validity of the Swedish version of the Burnout Assessment Tool.
Eszter Nagy, Noemi Nagy & Ildikó Takács. Adapting the BAT into Hungarian – a Study with Teacher Sample.
Beata A. Basinska, Anna M. Dåderman, Ewa Gruszczynska, Hans De Witte & Wilmar Schaufeli. Psychometric properties of the shortened versions of the Burnout Assessment Tool: Classical Test and Item Response Theories.
Part 3 @ Why not continue with some psychometric properties of the BAT? – Take 2 – multiple samples and multiple country studies
Linda Bára Lýdsdottir, Auðun Valborgarson, Berglind Stefánsdóttir, Brynja Magnusdottir & Gudrun Rakel Eiriksdottir. Psychometric properties of the Icelandic version of the Burnout Assessment Tool.
Nikita Kolachev, Maina Miletich & Evgeny Osin. Validating the Burnout Assessment Tool in Russian samples.
Jorge Sinval, Wilmar B. Schaufeli, Hans De Witte, Leon De Beer, Jakub Procházka, & Edgar C. Merkle. Update your priors! A Bayesian structural equation modeling analysis to the Burnout Assessment Tool.
Ömer Erdem Koçak, Clarissa Pinto Pizarro de Freitas & Ana Claudia S Vazquez. Measurement invariance of BAT between Turkey, Brazil and Ecuador.
Part 4 @ And now for something ‘completely different’: Burnout, coping, personality and power distance
Bianca Popescu & Laurentiu Maricutoiu. Lazarus and Folkman (1984) stress theory in the case of higher education students. A longitudinal investigation using the Burnout Assessment Tool.
Jakub Prochazka, Ludmila Dudasova & Martin Vaculik. The impact of relationships in adolescence on job burnout in adulthood.
Maina Miletich & Michael Bender. Job crafting, work engagement and burnout: The moderating role of power distance.
Group discussion and Wrap-up
Day 2 – 23.09.22
Part 1 @ ‘Going clinical’: Clinical burnout and burnout versus depression
Angelique de Rijk, Leila Emami, Hans De Witte, Robin Kok & Wilmar Schaufeli. Treatment of absent employees diagnosed with burnout in the Netherlands: predictive and concurrent validity of the burnout assessment tool (BAT).
Wilmar Schaufeli, Hans De Witte, Jari Hakanen & Janne Kaltiainen. Are international clinical cut-off scores for the BAT feasible?
Leon T. de Beer, Jari Hakanen, Alexandre J.S. Morin, Wilmar B. Schaufeli, Hans De Witte, Jürgen Glaser, Christian Seubert & Janne Kaltiainen. Preliminary findings on the construct relevant multidimensionality of burnout and a depression subscale across four countries and patient samples.
Hans De Witte, Wilmar Schaufeli & Robin Kok. Can we distinguish burnout, depression, strain an adaptation problems based on questionnaires? Comparing the BAT and the Four-Dimensional Symptom Questionnaire (4DSQ)
Part 2 @ Did the Covid-19 pandemic also ‘infect’ burnout levels?
Janne Kaltiainen & Jari Hakanen. Changes in burnout during COVID-19: the impact of age, gender, education, living alone, and telework in a Finnish five-wave population sample.
Jarrod Haar. Manager burnt-out risk in New Zealand: A five-wave study before, during, and after Covid-19 lockdowns.
Torhild Anita Sørengaard & Marit Christensen. Burnout in Norwegian employees with critical societal functions during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Angelique de Rijk & Robin Kok. More burnout due to the Covid-19 pandemic?
Part 3 @ And back to More ‘something completely different’: Burnout, deviance, incivility and covid-19 again
Shu Da, Silje Fossum Fladmark, Irina Wara, Marit Christensen & Siw Tone Innstrand. To change or not to change: A study of the association between workplace change and burnout and work engagement during the COVID-19 apndemic.
Francisca Carvalho, Silvia Silva, Donatella Di Marco & Wilmar Schaufeli. Effects of customer incivility on burnout: A moderated mediation model.
Jasmina Tomas & Darja Maslić Seršić. Committed and deviant: The moderating role of organizational commitment in the process linking job demands to workplace deviance through burnout.
Part 4 @ Looking back and forward
Outlook and Group discussion: How should the consortium proceed?
Wilmar Schaufeli
Closure
Hans De Witte